55. BENJAMIN JONES - A SPACE BETWEEN TOUCH AND TIME.
The first piece of work I ever saw of yours was a large print of a map made on carbon paper, where each place name had been crossed out - leaving a document of erasure -
It feels a long time ago now, but certainly still has echos in the current work. At the time I was thinking about how meticulous the process of mapping landscape is, compartmentalising and revealing through language and visual data. I was looking particularly at the UK National Parks which have this aura of being more natural / untouched / wild spaces, though of course are heavily human-altered landscapes. It is also a process that compresses history into a single plane of information.
I took maps of the Parks and crossed out every place name. Erasure provided a way to work against a sense of knowing a place via this overlay of information. To have this data is a comfort, promising predictability when navigating; the land has been charted, there are no unknowns. So this erasure is asking how our sense of place is shaped by information, how we project it onto reality, how this sense of knowing a place through it perhaps allows us to ‘confuse the map with the territory’, to believe that the totality of a place can be known in abstraction.
There’s also a reference to the past and future of these landscapes; in that they suggest a time before language had compartmentalised space into places, but also a future point where this language is somehow unreadable to whoever may be viewing it. This aspect of being able to simultaneously read multiple time scales or points of reference in a piece is something that I’ve remained interested in, and that carries through much of my work since these maps.
There is a reoccurring sense of physical space within your works, of land masses and of tangible surfaces that seem either to be very close or very far away - do you feel this and if so why is this?
There are varying scales of time present across the works, most often signified through natural subjects or the traces of darkroom processes. A work such a View Towards the Pacific 2019-22 deals with the geological timescale of erosion; the poppies published in issue #3 M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN) in contrast are far more ephemeral. As viewers, the span of our own lives are in a kind of dialogue with these various rhythms and cycles in the natural world.
The work Morning, Afternoon, a photograph of the sky with two suns published in issue #3, provides another example. A group of these works, printed on dibond panels, were installed throughout the village of Pieve Tesino, in Trentino, Italy, during summer 2023. They were made in response to the story of the village's shepherds who in the 1600’s left shepherding behind to become print sellers for a local print-works. They travelled the mountains on foot, going as far as Moscow and South America, away for great stretches of time. Their wives and children remained at home in the village; the two suns became a way to relate to that experience of separation via the measuring of the passage of days, tracked by the suns progress across the sky. Of course at this time, communication across such distances was nigh-on impossible for the average person. So these works use landscape to relate historical experience to the present. They were installed floating slightly off rough stone walls in passages, stairways and alleys, to generate chance encounters when navigating the village.
When I think of your works published in issue 1 and 3 of M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN), I think of first impressions and then as the eye settles into the image, the picture seems to change, emerging into something else, is there a process you tend to follow in the production of your works?
I’ve always been interested in how process and materiality develop meaning. Whether this is Giuseppe Penone cutting back the layers of a trees growth or Liz Deschenes photograms that integrate a viewers reflection and position into the work. It’s for this reason that I primarily use analogue processes; materials that are sensitive to light, touch, time, chemistry, exposure. Photography enables the image to be effected by and in dialogue with these aspects. Experimentation with process, exploring that particular language, is a constant in my practice. One that has resulted in various abstract groups of work made in cycles.
I also make ‘straight’ photographs, that are sometimes printed immediately, sometimes wait in the archive for a few years, and often are re-printed with different exposures, scale and paper type at different times; so a long term relationship with these relatively few selected images. What is significant for me is their poetic capacity for meaning, for engaging with the viewers interpretations, emotions and speculations, eschewing reliance on fact and narrative in favour of emotive weight. It’s due to that constant sense of more to be discovered that I return to poets such as Philip Larkin, Wallace Stevens and Leontia Flynn for example.
Thinking back to the works published in issue #1, a number were from a group titled Binder. These are collages I've been making since around 2019, with a new cycle of 7 completed last year. They are created by projecting multiple negatives onto sheets of light sensitive paper in the darkroom, masking different areas during each exposure to print each image into different areas, sometimes overlapping (and going black), sometimes remaining blank. They fragment the botanical source images and weave them together, pushing back at recognisability, setting these organic forms within a geometric framework. There is a lot of chance involved, the process layered enough that I can't exactly prefigure the outcome. This is one process of many, and a large part of what I do is experimentation with the materials to develop such approaches that define a group of works. Another example would be the group Fog, made with light, chemistry and light sensitive paper. Whilst Binder fragments and collages photographs, Fog appears somewhere between appearance and disappearance, with no discernible ‘image’. The title refers to the 'fogging' of paper; an accidental exposure to light. Defining the parameters before introducing chance is centrally important; the opposite is true in printing the straight photographs however, which require a lot of precision.
Across all these groups, I’m interested in what the experience of that final photographic object is. There are therefore commonalities, with most works made using a specific heavy weight, matte silver gelatin paper, displayed without being mounted to a substrate and so retaining a more sculptural form. Their frames are specifically designed to emphasise this object-hood, the sense of the print as a unique object that through material and scale has it's own history and presence. Bound to it's referent but independent, not a ‘window’. With emphasis on how it establishes distance from it and generates potential for new meaning, that as you recognised, has the capacity to change with time but also with the viewer.
Your meadow series have such a sense of calm, they are fragile and strong, fleeting and yet have a permanence - and needed to sit as a set to conclude the new issue of M-A. Please can you expand as to the process of how this series came into being and what they mean to you?
That fragility you picked up on is really at the core of it. When photographing something so small so close up, the physics of the lens dictate an incredibly shallow focus, itself something slight, delicate. These pictures are a kind of balancing act, a fragile slither of clarity prescribed by the proximity of camera to subject. I’ve never been so interested in making photographs that propose a neutrality or objectivity. The subjectivity of photography, its apparatus and materials, and the way it re-presents the world to distill or suggest something other, is what I’m interested to explore. So making these pictures became about this act of looking closer, taking a perspective less defined by our own bodies; so being on the ground, focused at this close distance, and making monochromatic images of these multicoloured scenes.
The whole series was made within a ø10m circle in an olive grove in Provence, where I was on a residency last year as part of the Galerie Heimet/NG Art Creative Prize. Traditionally the ground between trees is cleared to minimise competition for nutrients. In this case it hadn’t been, with great botanical biodiversity the result; that also provided a habitat and food source for numerous insects. I became interested in this overlapping, tangled world hidden nearest the ground, like looking at the weave that comprises the wider landscape. A less ordered space, more chaotic and opposed to agriculturally organised space. They are structured photographs, heavily composed and pictorial, something that emphasises their constructed nature as a trace of their subject. Their relationship between ephemerality and permanence then, is centred on the fact of these plants brief existence and the way their appearance punctuates the seasonal cycle; participating in processes of pollination etc, that are part of a slower, deeper natural rhythm.
You have a particular relationship with Italy which seems to be evolving, can you expand upon this connection and what you have learned since being based there?
Since 2020 I’ve been working with Loom Gallery in Milan, and so have produced a number of projects with them including a solo show in the gallery last year; previously a collaboration with Antonini Milano and group presentation in Ljubljana. The conversations around the work have been brilliant, and so of course you meet people, the work is seen, new collaborations are instigated; there’s a fantastic energy there. The most significant of these was an invitation last year to participate in Una Boccata d’Arte, a nationwide project initiated by Fondazione Elpis and Galleria Continua, that included a residency and public commission in the village of Pieve Tesino, Trentino. It bore the Morning, Afternoon works I mentioned earlier, and a large piece (To Live Inside a Second) that will become a permanent installation. The whole project was developed in response to local histories and installed throughout the village during summer 2023. So indeed the relationship is evolving, with opportunities to expand the scope of my practice through these sorts of collaborations.
What has been learned specifically is somehow difficult to pin down; of course it’s bound up in personal and working relationships, exposure to different histories and places. It's really a sedimentation of all the conversations, interpretations and opportunities to develop the work. It is also however the increased awareness of Italian art, design, landscape and architectural history; experienced in a way that research from afar does not permit, understanding the shape this history gives to the present, and how it underscores a sensibility.
Since the pandemic years life has changed near unrecognisably, and so it's hard to separate everything out. The experience has regardless been formative, and I now travel there multiple times a year. It’s become a hugely important place, now populated with great friends and collaborators. The opportunity to work intensively in any country other than your own I think gives a stronger sense of the changing world, of commonalities and localised challenges, and a new perspective on what defines the culture you originate from.
All works courtesy the Artist and Loom Gallery, Milan.
All images copyright Benjamin Jones.
Benjamin Jones is a contributing artist to issue 1 and issue 3 of M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN).
54. RUTH ASAWA - A SPACE BETWEEN THE INDELABLE AND EPHERMERAL.
When Forms Come Alive - Hayward Gallery - LONDON.
shadows drip -
awaiting surrender to pool
- a presence suspended
cages as cases of a fruit long decayed
to leave an outline - a combe - a line
as a scribbling of biro
- to blur into umbra - to form a state between the dissolving
as these drops nestle their Siamese
as a feather grows within a womb -
a scientists diagram
to rest within the dormancy of an atmosphere
rusted to inspire a russet dust
to halo these swollen orbs
elongated - by far away bulbs - to pulse a lunar tide
extruded - by fingers out of reach
undulating a waist - tender and gravid
a pregnancy of volume
a bubble birthed within these rings
to further drip down to be caught up within -
- within these wire jars, these baskets of the collected
- as eggs that will remain unhatched
embryonic and empty
discarded shadow skins - hang suspended
dripping to pools of puddled penumbrae across an illuminated floor
- pulled up across the walls - an extrusion from within a memory
an evidence of an ephemeral rhythm to remain indelible.
When Forms Come Alive - Hayward Gallery - Until 7 May, 2024.
53. FRANCESCA BATTAGLIA: A SPACE BETWEEN STILLNESS AND MOVEMENT.
I remember meeting you in tutorials, in those beautiful big rooms in Lime Grove, and filling my eyes with your pictures. There was always this sense of movement and the perfumed warmth of an Italy remembered - as if from a film - where characters were dressed immaculately and high drama was ushered into frame. Your image within the new issue of M-A - I feel is a very concentrated image of you, can you discuss this work and where you were within yourself when it was made?
At the time I was working on my final major project. The core of the project was the fear of forgetting, of losing memory. I wanted to focus on my roots, on my family, to be able to put together an experience and a body of work that could reassemble a story that would become timeless. I was getting a bit stuck in the process, trying to chase something deep and real that could tell a sincere personal story. I was obsessed with taking pictures of places and things. I guess my aim was to explore how to tell a story of people by taking pictures of still objects and places. That’s when this image was made. I was taking some test shots in my flat in West London in the spring. I was focusing on the still life working with objects that I could find around in the flat. My room faced a small courtyard down a basement, there was this beautiful flowery plant that had dropped and scattered all the flowers around creating a flowery carpet just right outside my glassdoor. I had found a blue plastic bag that had fallen down from the street so I took it and filled it up with all the flowers almost all already dried.
I think I realized it maybe a bit later, after leaving London, growing up, that during that period of my life I was going through a hard time with my mental health and that those images of dried flowers and pomegranates pictured also where I was within myself in that period.
The painterly palettes you return to, why are you drawn to that particular range?
I guess what I like is softness, something that is gentle and tender. I guess it’s also the palette of the places I know. Where I grew up, in the north east of Italy, near lakes and mountains where everything is slow paced and silent, the light grey of the stone of houses, the brown of the wooden roofs, the green of hills and fields. Another place I feel at home is Ibiza, the incredible colors of the island’s nature overwhelm me every summer since I was born: the red of the sun, soil and rocks, matched with the colors of pinewoods and the deep blue of the sea.
The memory of these places blended together creates my palette. And now that my work concentrates also more on portraits and sometimes capturing someone really close, I find that in the nuances of people’s skin, eyes and hair.
There is a particular melancholy that feels like a dapple of memories within your work - which I am drawn to. There is a tension there and a sense of the unresolved, which feels very poised, can you reflect upon why you depict this state and what are the questions which thread through the work?
I love how you worded it, I relate a lot to this description.
Whenever I think about a project I want it to be real, to be reasoned and sincere. I want to capture the truthfulness of the subject: an honest look, a natural slouch posture, a gesture, a crease on the fabric of what they’re wearing. I’m not into perfection and constructions.
As I mentioned in a previous answer, I’m scared of losing memory, and this definitely reflected on my urge to take pictures and make videos, which luckily growing up became my job. There is definitely melancholy, especially in my past work and I acknowledge it today in my current projects. This unfolds also when thinking about moving image. The sense of the unresolved you talk about could definitely be the thread in my film language. I’m fascinated by movement but also by stillness, on how dynamic and powerful a still frame can be. That’s why I’m probably so drawn to film, I feel so absorbed by the freedom of it and the variety of ways I can choose to tell a story. It’s not easy to describe it in words, I’m just really really passionate and I’m sure it’s the medium I’m actually more naturally prone to to express myself.
Your Italian-ness is again, specific to you and I greatly appreciate that in your work. There is often a tension between fashion and art, do you feel this and if so why?
Italy has of course a huge historic cultural and artistic heritage and in every part of it you can find unique breathtaking places filled with history. Sometimes it feels like the time has stopped in some places. The fact that you can feel, smell and touch something so fascinating that’s been there for centuries, it’s inspiring. This belonging is for sure very present in my work. Fashion is a big part of Italian culture as well as art. It fascinates me, I am passionate about it. I think that my way to communicate, my way to tell stories and take pictures is more focused on the subject in front of the camera, that fashion becomes almost impalpabile in my work. It isn’t explicit nor literal, it’s not the main focus, it’s part of the subject, it needs to be merged with it and tell something about it. I feel like a need to find a story in every picture I take, and clothes definitely tell stories.
You studied in London at a fascinating moment of national change, and I remember the characters within your community - together this seemed to simultaneously provoke and support your artistic development. There is often a criticism that the space between education and life after education is widening, do you feel this and if so what do you feel should change?
Yes, it definitely influenced my artistic development. I often think though that my experience was strongly affected by the rush to start so soon. There was this urgency to start university right after high school, like you shouldn’t waste a second between each step of education otherwise you could lose interest in studying, lose the moment. At least that is very common in Italian conception on education timings.
When I was 19 I remember having this feeling that I couldn’t miss the moment. I had to know exactly what my future would be, and choose right away my path. Moving to a new country in a big city, to a world so different from the small province town where I grew up, it was definitely a big step. I think it’s really important to take the chance if you have the opportunity, while you’re still fresh and eager to learn and discover, when you’re finally free to choose your way. But I also think it should happen when you really feel ready for it and when you’re more self-conscious. I think this brought in a lot of insecurities in my experience and made it more difficult to go through. While in education you can feel like you have to perform and do well and this can compromise your mental health.
This can happen also after graduating university. That space between education and landing into life and starting a career, it can be scary. When you’re a student you feel kind of in a safe zone. After education, that fades away and you’re on your own. It’s not easy to find a way to earn money doing what you love or what you studied for especially if you have to support yourself in an expensive city.
What I’ve learned after finishing my studies and growing up is that if you have passion, it’s never too late to change direction and explore something new. So there shouldn’t be pressure in choosing a path when you’re approaching education and there shouldn’t be pressure while experiencing it. Every imperfect experience builds you up as a person, but you should feel more relaxed and free regarding what you want to choose for yourself and for your future.
The personification of space is very present within your work - I remember from the early works I saw that you made, to the recent images, why do you feel you are drawn to these spaces?
I think I am drawn to spaces where I get curious, where I can imagine a narrative. I’m also really fascinated by architecture, how a space is designed and its history. I try to imagine what stories a place holds. Sometimes I wish I could see what happened there in the past, through the years, imagining stories of people. It really fascinates me. And I’m always attracted to details that sometimes aren’t noticed.
I attribute a special meaning to some places, and I want to keep them impressed in my memory, sometimes there are places I just pass by and I know I won’t visit again, sometimes they are very familiar in my present but I know someday I won’t see anymore.
For this reason, I use photography in a kind of obsessive way, always taking pictures on my phone when a detail captures my gaze.
Francesca Battaglia is a contributing artist to issue 3 of M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN).
52. JOHN SINGER SARGENT: A SPACE BETWEEN ART AND FASHION.
Sargent and Fashion - Tate Britain - LONDON.
The bobbing of paper lanterns and the witnessing of a swarm of tiny unfurlings - illuminating the glosses of lilies - popped open, the micro parasols - weighted in pollen, sticky with scent. And the roses, abundant and scattering of their harvest of petals - delicate and a chatter with brushstrokes gleaned from many gloamings.
An upstep of heel treading the violet dust of an imagined earth.
To capture cloth as if to listen to its very fibre - of impressions more akin to murmurings than definitions - lapping, pearlescence of a purring, bubbling calm.
His romance is to engulf, to suspend and to flush -
A corset laced so tightly - a bosom of blossoms - a fluttering of clementine ribbons - and yet the swathes of blacks, charcoals and ebonies envelope with descending cloaks of the impending.
Fashion - the audaciously tardy teenager - lost within their love of the fleeting, the door-slamming demands for attention and the special treatments negotiated for the rewards of such mysterious beauty and eternal youth - where the alignment of silhouette, fabrication, and atmospheric timing play a poker match of tactility.
And to art - somehow nobler, wiser and calmer? And so, more reliable and respected? And because of this, somehow more bankable even controllable? John Singer Sargent dares to occupy both trade traits with the fascinating directness of not just the artist but the art director - who employs, even tames the perfected technique to present and seduce without conceptual weight. As then and now, Sargent's target audience is consumer lead and in so doing he protects a legacy as a creator and also as a service industry - a bridge between two industries - where every subject surely leaves a happy customer. However, as with trends of technique rooted in time, the shelf life can form an obstacle when viewed in retrospect.
It is this, the often overt impression of fashionable success that Sargent perpetuates through his work - that somehow falls foul of the art world’s cardinal oath of a confessional truth confided by the noble artisan who suffers alone, and for all the implied champagne cork pops of Sargent’s atmospheric belle époques - it is sometimes hard to follow the script. His subjects do not appear to depict the dour, devoted disciples of faith as the jeweled-toned clouds of Titian's subjects suggest or the patron saints of the noble as favored by Velasquez - Sargent dares to centre his illuminating brushes not on celebrating faith but instead on fashioning celebrity, utilising the techniques of the brotherhood of artisans who proceed him, and this is his conceptual provocation.
Viewing these works today - Sargent’s ability to seemingly weigh hearts against feathers - feels faux - deep down, as he entertains with a classism that is loaded for the loaded, exclusive, and excluding, as all great fashion is - unforgiving and tailor-made to flatter the benefactor alone, however admired. Conceptually provocative when considering the means for which some such Victorian fortunes were amassed, who patronised Sargent’s ability to render his subjects as meaningful even iconic. This bookable Midas touch, entertains - but does not, fully convince - to modern eyes perplexed and weary of news-stories whose heroines do not have the choice to wear their hearts on such haute couture sleeves.
And yet, just as the great fashion makers know, it is in the juxtaposition that the tension, the catalysts for change lives. Sargent is surely a signaling influencer to each of the societal tastemakers who follow his legacy, in the camp of Cecil Beaton's charm, in the noble stature of Richard Avendon's knowing reduction and in the impossible drama of Annie Leibovitz's filmic knowledge of the jarring - a lynchpin in a style, which defines modern portraiture.
Sargent and Fashion - Tate Britain Until 7th July 2024.
51. NATHAN VON CHO: A SPACE BETWEEN THE BOW AND THE STRINGS.
‘I really wanted to be a vessel: M-A speaking through my violin and I.’ N.V.C
Before I ever heard you play I saw you play, when we walked into the David Zwirner gallery for the first time, you closed your eyes and performed without a physical violin. I found that to be fascinating - watching you play I was amazed at how both physical and metaphysical the process of creating and performing music is... can you expand upon your creative process?
David Zwirner has such a unique presence about it and I also noticed that my speaking voice carried like we were in a church. I guess as soon as I found out the position I was going to play in, without much thought going into it, I naturally closed my eyes and imagined how the violin would complement the acoustics of the Gallery. This way I know what I can get away with and how I bring the space and violin to life.
Your relationship with your violin is very particular, I remember you saying that there was a period of time when you wanted to reject what you knew, and yet you chose to perform with it - can you tell me about Nathan and the violin?
My violin has been my partner in crime for more than 20 years and I actually cannot imagine a world without it. Of course - having gone through childhood & my teenage years (maybe even up to my early twenties) I had my battles where everything else in life seemed so much more appealing. Be it rugby, friends or just anything that was not the violin. They even wanted to take away my music scholarship back in secondary school because I was that distant from it but my violin teacher at the time Mr Burov, stopped the music department from stripping me of my scholarship saying: "just wait, Nathan will come back to the violin" and I think this quote sums up my relationship with my instrument very accurately. Looking back, I was extremely lucky with all my violin teachers. They really filled the father role for me growing up which I in retrospect, desperately needed. It was more than just violin lessons, now they are beautiful memories for me so, as I also teach music, I try to carry the message as I was shown, ‘from the heart to the heart’.
I knew that I really wanted you to be involved with the opening ceremony of the new issue of M-A because you have an energy that is rare and urgent. A contagious energy that I first encountered last year. I asked each of the artists presenting to choose an image from issue 3 to reinterpret in their own way - your choice was fast and fascinating - can you recall the process of developing work for Thursday 11th January?
I do remember that moment and process. Yes - it was indeed quite fast and I was torn between two images for a brief period but I really like the style of the main character, (Boy with Pink Aerosol, Stroud Green, 2006, Eva Vermandel) the cap, the jawline even. Something about that image was screaming inside me that I could relate to, the style and the colours. One quite amusing fact about this process is that only after I chose the picture (three days before the event to be exact) I realised the boy actually looks like he is playing the violin! It could also be a phone but obviously, the first idea appeals to me more. There is that sense of brushing someone away, multitasking or even impatience and you mentioned that my energy is urgent (which is a word I haven't heard before to describe me) and the boy in the picture - looking at it now has - definitely an urgency.
There is evidently a lot of discipline which is invested in the pursuit of mastering the violin, so many rules and yet you seem to break down these rules when you play. That particular feeling of suspended charge that comes with the risk-taking of adventuring off-piste, which your audience was transfixed in witnessing - can you expand on the relationship with boundaries when you create and perform?
If I had to use one phrase to describe the event or even my life, it is "rule-breaking" not always in the most artistic of manners as I almost got kicked out of school for not adhering to the rules. You specifically asked me to wear what I wanted and be myself (when I performed`) which for a classical musician is not something you hear every day. I feel like classical music at the current stage is like a 5-course meal and sometimes you just want a snack. I would like to be the bridge to make classical music more accessible and for people to approach it lightly without having to mentally prepare or take out 90 minutes of their lives. Going back to rule breaking, I only really composed the first 4 lines of the melody and for the rest, I just let something else channel through me so if you ask me to repeat what I did on the night: I probably couldn't. That is the beauty of it where it is something that won't be recreated exactly. This event definitely was an eye-opener for me to really just go for ideas I have in my head because that space, the present moment sharing with my fellow performers & the audience. I really wanted to be a vessel: M-A speaking through my violin and I. One last point to make would be engaging with the audience. Not in a talking to them verbally kind of way but feeling out how full the space is, how much of the sound they absorb and how much I can push, and what I would like to do, which at the time, is just in my head until the bow meets the strings.
Culturally you are diverse in your lived experiences, South Korea, Berlin, and London - how have you been influenced by your journeying through these spaces and how have you explored this knowledge within your practice as an artist working today?
I am super grateful to have had the opportunity to live in different countries, mix with different cultures, and be a part of religious cultures from where I do not originate - but on top of that - one common denominator, they all have is music - in my experience, the violin. Having a Russian Guru who was only in Berlin due to half of Berlin being split due to historical & political circumstances, playing for Jewish weddings growing up, speaking Hebrew and even playing for the Royal family's Christmas reception. These are experiences and influences one cannot take for granted and have affected my music-making massively.
Special thanks: Eva Vermandel and Sunny Sun. Sara Chan and Aoife Kelly-McCann - David Zwirner.
50. YOKO ONO: A SPACE BETWEEN MAXIMUM SILENCE.
YOKO ONO: Music of the Mind - Tate Modern - LONDON.
A typewriter - embossing without a ribbon.
A call for response where no reply is needed.
'Hello this is Yoko'
A harmonious gloom of shadows cast from a caste of chairs requires no impression.
Paintings of unfinished shadows, of water droplets - of whispered - imagined instructions and collected skies.
'A frame of mind, an attitude, determination, and imagination that springs naturally out of the necessity of the situation.’ Y.O.
Cut pieces away - while I watch you - while you watch me and while we never make eye contact. To hold these scissors and to practice an invited assault while an instinct is over-ridden - while my heart beats faster. Take whatever you want to take not what I want to give.
To slice through a life with a katana precision, as to reek the domestic - ridiculous, unliveable - when viewed in surprised retrospection - with an understanding of maximum silence.
To soak hands in this stillness and stare out - through the fourth wall, looking for the collaborator, the other half of a puzzle never to be solved or completed. These pieces await and yet it is the space between which is more present, more painful than these creamy-coated souvenir souvenirs - these severed props which began as a comedy and conclude as a tragedy.
An invisible city built in perspex, audacious in adolescence - now chipped with the wounds of removal and the evidence of provenance.
This distilled metropolis, whose light-less structures cast an impression, not a shadow.
Atop this rooftop penthouse - rests an apple totem - perpetual in life - symbolic in renewal.
The iconography of the implausible, of egoless empire - of tart temptation - a readygrown - readymade, whose skin will never wrinkle and whose flesh will never feed.
From these imagined constructs - a view can be felt, a horizonless landscape sustained, as a scudding of daydreams fill forever blue, where 'you can eat all the clouds in the sky' and where the sunsets last for days - and yet an internal starless darkness persists - as molecules of ink - circulate as a pointillist's insistence, in a tapping which collectively leaves a tattooing trace and a jarring humm in this silence - to freckle a skin of touches.
'Molecules are always at the verge of half disappearing and half emerging...to wear different hats as our heartbeat is always one.' Y.O.
YOKO ONO: MUSIC OF THE MIND - Tate Modern - Until 1st September 2024.
Special Thanks Anna Overment and Kyung Hwa Shon.
49. SUNNY SUN - A SPACE BETWEEN AWARENESS AND RESTRICTION.
‘Do I need to be objective about something I don’t feel is quite right?’
S.S.
We were talking recently about the notion of not needing to be convinced - when something feels right, can you expand upon this idea and how it relates to you?
I realised when I speak to others, who like different things, they always try to convince you with their point of view, the reason, a different understanding and insight. No matter what they say - they can’t really convince me - everyone seems to try to be neutral in different circumstances, but is that really possible? I start asking myself ‘Do I need to be objective about something I don’t feel is quite right?’
The attractiveness or reluctance of anything comes from the thing itself, not from how anyone tried to explain/justify it. So I believe no one can be convinced, or anything can convince anyone, if anyone has an opinion I guess it cannot be explained. But at the same time when things are good enough, your instinct will feel it.
You know I love your photographs, your contribution to issue one of M-A was so distilled, even private and yet your pictures have a specific generous quality which seem to welcome interpretation.
The series from Hong Kong feels so strong, the sleeping father, the granular city in the scorching heat of August... when you look at your work what do you see now?
Umm, Joe you know I never take photography seriously just like a ‘photographer‘. Always out of focus, films out of date, or even with a random camera. I started picking up shooting images (won’t say photography as I don’t think it’s proper) when the mood comes, My mother playing mahjong, capturing the sound that I got so annoyed as a kid that eventually I felt at home hearing it. Or my father sleeping on the couch (just like a mugshot, no shame but scared at the same time). When I first started to take images, I felt the struggle between trying to be brave, and the reluctance of pressing the shutter. Once I pressed the button, everything stopped within that image, no idea if it is overexposed, or even if anything comes out. I guess that’s the tedious journey of being with film without doing it properly, the instinct of that split moment, no idea, not feeling secure. But that nervousness captured how I felt at that time, its abstract and intimate that only myself will feel.
Now I look back by the perfectly edited down images, I felt thouse nerves, the struggle to make my mind up. It’s just like looking back to the first word of a public speech. Maybe I meant something maybe it didn't, but looking back what’s real and what’s not? I guess going back to being convinced or not I am glad the audience felt differently from the images, they probably find more values in those images that I did while I took them. I find that quite fascinating.
I had a first look at the first series of M-A, and I said that this is the only tactile media I’ve read in my life that makes me want to flip back and think what exactly is this? I recalled looking at my images - I almost forgot what I’ve taken. I guess I wasn’t convinced, the images convinced myself or others of something else, memory stayed intimate to myself. You see, no one knew it was my father...
You are a designer also, and you favour a very discreet aesthetic that resonates with a respect for materials which you seem to see almost like ingredients... There is a certain shrugged on invisible - gentle quality within your own identity and your images reflect that - can you trace back to the key moments in your life which have helped form the way you see?
I was never shown as a masculine person, I like feeling humanity, being free flow. Feeling material and craft but also knowing the fact that there are some sort of invisible rules. Images are the same, I recalled myself saying, my images have to be film, but in a P&S camera with no settings, I like to set myself rules but nothing looks stable. Of course from time to time I stopped using film and I just have that awareness of restriction inside me and again, every images comes out as random as it looks. The formal sense is hidden to myself, same from taking pictures, to the clothing I like, or the things I want to design really.
Your loyalty to your own instinct is probably the thing I respect most about you, and I know that people in your circle feel the same way, you are the go-to person to ask about sourcing. In fact I think the first time we met you were striding through a studio triumphantly holding a double-faced tweed coat from Jil Sander in one hand which you had freshly acquired and had already secured a buyer - your ease in acquiring amazing things is certainly a talent, do you remember the first objects you started to collect?
Aha, the Jil Sander, was a steal back in the day and reselling since I knew I won’t be wearing it!
I guess I like to understand products and items from the second-hand market, and how it was worn. I always believed that clothing is like a tech, its existed to be used, and to be felt and to solve problems.
Not only what I buy and wear, as an accessories designer, we love to collect materials, hardware or tools. We appreciate them and think how it can be enhanced, or even solve problems in a design/product perspective. I love factories and rustic sourcing markets, they are people that fulfil our fantasies, solve the problem that we wanted to be solved. Designers are there to solve problems, not only practicality but also aestheticly, I guess that’s my core and that’s why I love participating in sourcing too.
I remembered the first ever thing I really started to crave and buy multiples of were Tricker’s shoes. I really liked the shapes, and everything. But eventually I stopped wearing them, and looking back - how on earth I wore them - so rigid and heavy, and travelled everywhere? Except being so hard to wear in at first, Tricker’s shoes are a wonderful piece of tech.
Your returning to London always interests me - even when you are not there your mind seems to be in some way there, what is it about the city that resonates within you?
London means home to me, I’ve been here for 10 years. It’s great to feel, revisit and explore the city, it’s always cinematic, passionate in some ways and quite special despite the fact that more and more people rant about London.
I’ve been living in many cities and I miss and fantasise about london a lot. This time I’ve moved back - I am not a student. I feel that London makes the majority of us special - We are all enjoying, expressing and struggling...
For me London gives you things that cannot be bought with money.
48. DAIDO MORIYAMA - A SPACE BETWEEN DESIRE AND TERMOIL.
Daido Moriyama: A Retrospective - The Photographers Gallery - LONDON.
A blur of an unknown street, exhausted tulips surrender, teeth lick, 'I am constantly observing the city', 3am naked, electric light and black shaddows. Araknid paused - ready to scuttle, the exposed metal intestines of a motorbike,
footprints in the slush, mesh, fish-scales, tiles undulate,'People's desires are endless'. Rubber tires tessellate, stockinged legs, gated fences, observed encounters, tarpaulins sweat, the mannequin severed, all become equal. The
signature granular of the ingrained, the arousal of the saturated violence of colour, occasional, the darkness of death.'The human world is erotic' Behind glass - laid out as if awaiting a chalk outline - relentlessly passive probe
printed pages overhead and overheard Moriyama murmurings.'I am always in a state of emotional turmoil' The plethora of an unshelved library - damp as if the first things saved from a fire - neatly, calmly awaiting the next viewer, the next
voyeur the next body. Forensic and cold to touch, burnt into paper - exotic in weight, erotic in tender - like cigarette paper or cicada wings - cut - cut sharp - detached. 'I don't feel at ease when I am shooting' To inhale these
sticky sheets is to see the secrets, to feel these ferals, which glisten and undulate with a painful ferocity - tiny breathing dialogues, caught in a
viewfinders' trap, hooked on an inky intimacy, still wet - so close - the eyelash brush of his window cannot be unseen.
Daido Moriyama - A Retrospective - The Photographers Gallery - 16-18 Ramillies Street, London W1F 7LW. Until 11 February 2024.
Special thanks: Martin Steininger.
47. GERHARD RICHTER - A SPACE BETWEEN DISARRAY AND ALMOST NOTHING.
Gerhard Richter - David Zwirner - LONDON.
Spluttering, undulating clouds squashed between glass - as in a microscope - a slide - analysing life - the beginning - made towards the end.
a micro-line ticks forth as on a graph - connecting dots - a constellation - charting a course.
A map viewed from above - where colours indicate symbolism, shading regions and masses darken depth.
Landlines cut into a terrane - exposed in the full flow of controlled volatility, the diagrammatic splicing of a leaden cloud.
The marking, amorphous of meetings - of melding, of bleeding and healing of reaction and action to erasure.
Of minerals under scrutiny of an eagle's eye, sawing above - the telescopic range of NASA - the cosmos overwhelms yet ignites - a steady hand at mission control. A world beyond - a world within - all is made of such matter. To The unblinking of these emerald pools -
- a dilation - where inks bleed and freckle a genus.
These micro graphite configurations - a psychiatrist's analysis - the tracery of the barely, an outline to define an impossible - an almost nothing.
A flushed roomscape emerges from a swathe of washes - as a tide draws back - exposed the headlights of passing in the night - a still from a progression - a sequence of future memories - as such clouds engulf these sunsets - the phosphorescence - these shimmering auroras. The ruin of a drop to further dive into the green - the validifying context of chance - the chance of a master of control - now swimming in the night - why now to revel in such encounters?
To scour the surface at right angles to counter and encounter this organic. To appraise these meetings of ink and paper of then and now.
Such subtle tenderness - catching colours - unexpectant of the violence in plain sight - volatile, momentary and permanently scared. - Scratched insertions disrupt the near-solidified solutions in their final moments of lucidity - to drag back a surface to expose an emergent - chalken line of the vulnerable - not ready to be set in stone.
A crackling through the shellac glosses of the sealed in the semi-permanence of a reign storm - to reach a relief from the impending.
The occasional bubbles escape the depths to reach the surface - to flush with blushes of remembrance.
Presented from behind the engineered - graphite frames of the creator's vision - looking out - looking within. Crisply defined as the sheets of identical paper, a ground of snow where horizons meet the sky - to trace the silhouetted clouds from a child's eye.
“What characterizes drawing even more obviously than painting is the sense of disarray, the absence of a way out.… Drawing is … an erasure, an almost nothing, right at the extreme edge where everything would fall into pieces. Just before then you stop.”
— Gerhard Richter, 1997
Gerhard Richter - Until 28 March 2024, David Zwirner - 24 Grafton Street, London
Special thanks Sara Chan and Kyung Hwa Shon.
46. MASAOMI YASUNAGA - A SPACE BETWEEN HOLE AND WHOLE.
‘Clouds in the Distance’ - Lisson Gallery - LONDON.
'Beauty can be discovered in the most unconventional situations.’ M.Y.
A psychological archeological haul, presented in the blinking daylight of a time in delay - like the memory of touching the clouds, as a child.
A time machine's contents where such relics are scoured for answers, seemingly created in the depths of a darkness - their inward eyes baked shut, their heartbeat too slow to hear, but to touch these tremulous barnacled bodies is to sense that their kiln birth - forever warm. A grandmother’s ashes form a porcelain memory - crystalised and hot with tears to dissolve into the porous.
To hatch the insects and protruding bones of a ruin. A construction of rubble, where foundations are absent and the ceilings cave.
'When I create, I always envision a distant view, an act of seeing afar'. M.Y.
These unearthed - amniotic fluid glazed jars hold their holes to cast internal beams in a dormancy of rest - vacant, abandoned yet meniscus full - all these nothings have meant more to me than so many somethings - The escaped or rolled back stones expose the gaping of the dropped granites of the monsters bite - such teeth marks afirm that the space is greater than the sum of such parts.
'Beauty can be discovered in the most unconventional situations.’ M.Y.
Poisons bubble, spurt and splinter to hue a mosaic of excavated evidence - formed under the pressure of violence, of ego and the melted prestige of fallen kingdoms - relics still stunned in stillness - once lucid and undulating - now brittle and dry, exposed on a beach awaiting the tide to conceal, to return.
'The ultimate goal of my art is not self expression but what's left of self, after being filtered through fire'. M.Y.
Masaomi Yasunaga ‘Clouds in the Distance’ - until 10 February 2024 - Lisson Gallery - 67 Lisson Street, London.
Photography Sunny Sun for M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN)
Special thanks: The Lisson Gallery.
45. EVA VERMANDEL - A SPACE BETWEEN CALLING AND CAPTURE.
The artist discusses her creative process.
‘I do wonder sometimes whether I’m just a vessel that captures things that get sent to me and need to be caught.’ E.V.
The first time I saw your works, I was immediately amazed at how you communicate emotion - images that are so luminous they can be seen when the eyes are closed - at what point did you know that photography was your way forward?
Thank you so much, emotion is what I try to communicate so it’s incredibly gratifying to hear that that is what you take away from my work, and so intensely.
I was about four-five years old when I first picked up a camera. My father was an amateur photographer and we’d often go for walks together with his camera in tow. He’d occasionally let me take a picture with it. Back then, in the late 70ies/early 80ies, photography was precious and expensive, so this was done sparingly, we were not a rich family. By the time I was a teenager, my dad let me use his Contax to shoot the odd film, and the curious thing is that the pictures I took back then have the same intensity and atmosphere they still have now. So I think it came embedded in me.
That said, I’ve often battled with the actual medium of photography, with its directness. The art I get drawn to most is painting. There’s such a freedom to bring the emotion of an experience to the fore in painting, rather than the de facto ‘this is what occurred’ element that often gets represented in photography. The result is that my practice revolves around breaking through the directness that is inherent to photography.
For years I found this directness a restraint, and up until a couple of years ago I did toy with the idea of switching to painting, until I realised that my battle with the directness of the medium is what makes my work so singular. I revel in pushing the camera to its limits, and this often happens not through special effects but simply through intense observation. This can go so deep that I feel that it is me who is being swallowed up through the lens, rather than the other way around.
Over the years I have become aware that I don’t ‘create’ my work, but that I ‘catch’ it. The sharpening of my craft lies in training my instincts to feel these moments brew and trust that whatever it is that needs to be captured will get thrown in my direction. Even on the few occasions that I have worked in a constructed manner, there will still be elements within that constructed setup that guide me rather than me guiding them.
'Boy with Pink Aerosol' seems to be such a pivotal image, how did that portrait come into being?
I personally wouldn’t call it a portrait, rather a state of being. At the core of the image lie the gestures of the arms, which are both engaged with elements you can’t see, and the tilt of the head and neck. There are also details that are so slight that the viewer needs to fill them in. It’s a puzzling work and it requires active looking. I love what Francis Bacon said about art: “the job of the artist is to deepen the mystery”. I fully empathise with that.
It happened upon me in the summer of 2006, when I had gone for a walk with my Mamiya 7 near where I used to live. I came across a group of teenagers spraying graffiti on a section of Parkland Walk, north London. This is a disused railway track that is now a nature reserve and favourite haunt for locals. Several of the leftover structures of the railway get graffiti-ed on a regular basis and that afternoon these boys were having a go at it.
I asked if I could photograph them. I remember that the boy in the photograph is called Phil. He had an elegance about him that drew me to him more than the other two boys. I think he must’ve been around 16 at the time, so he’ll be well in his thirties now. I deliberately underexposed the negative to get the background to drop away and to enable his skin, which was luminous, to become even more radiant.
The post-production of this work was as important as the creation of the work itself. To achieve the depth of the luminosity of the skin, the underexposure of the negative was pretty extreme, about three stops; afterwards I had to rebuild the parts that had nearly disappeared. All in all it took me about five years to get it to a point where it felt right. It’s not the only work that took me years to finish.
I love the fact that it can take me years to get a photograph ready for print. It reinforces the long-time-frame undercurrent of the work. A lot of artists I admire have elements of this in their workflow too: Edvard Munch often reworked his paintings or revisited the same theme/setup he’d painted before. He once said “I don’t paint what I see; I paint what I saw” which resonates with me immensely. He’d spend hours just sitting opposite a person, not touching his canvas to then paint them after they’d gone. The galloping horse he painted in 1910 was done from memory. He must have deeply absorbed what he saw in those split seconds that it was happening to be able to paint it in such a dynamic way afterwards.
Pierre Bonnard is another example of prolonged-time artists: he’d show up at the opening of his own exhibitions, brush and paints in hand, to add more touches to the works installed on the wall. Or he’d repaint a whole section of a painting years after its initial completion. He’d ask sitters to walk around as he was painting them, which enabled him to shift the focus on the rhythm and colour of the work rather than the ‘likeness’ of it. One of his sitters, Dina Vierny, said that he asked her to walk all the time; to ‘live’ in front of him, trying to forget he was there.
You need time to process what is happening AND life is in constant flux. These two factors combined mean - for me at least - that art needs space to breathe and will never be, neither should be, ‘finished’.
The title of your book, 'Splinter', is fascinating, the idea that elements of a whole can fracture and get underneath your skin - I really feel that within your works. What are the key images that you return to within your collection and what do they tell you?
Thank you, yes, the name Splinter was suitable for the work. It has many ways of interpreting it, which I like. Aside from the splinter as something that gets underneath your skin there’s also the fact that a splinter comes from a tree, a beautiful thing (trees are such a joy!). Then there’s also the feeling of being splintered. And there’s the famous Adorno quote: “The splinter in your eye is the best magnifying glass available”. It’s such a versatile word that can be used in so many different contexts and interpretations.
In terms of what the key images in my work could be: these often change. Over time works that were key get overtaken by other works and then things change all over again. The work is never static, it keeps evolving, within the existing work and in the process of the creation of the work.
This is also why Giorgio Del Buono of Systems Studio, who designed my website - and did so most beautifully and insightfully - created the randomisation of the Selected sections on the site. I love the way that every time the page gets reloaded different images will be thrown together: through this process new elements you - or I for that matter - hadn’t spotted before come out through these randomised juxtapositions.
As to ‘Splinter’ as a book, I now see it more as a collection of early works rather than a ‘project’ or ‘body of work’. I’ve completely stepped away from the ‘project’ approach that is so prevalent in photography. When I put work on display I like to mix up pieces created throughout my whole practice, old and new. New work can add a whole different dimension to older work and vice-versa; there’s always a dialogue: within the work, between the work. I find the idea of a ‘project’ far too constrained and it doesn’t fit with my thinking.
To get back to the point of key works: even though they often change, there are some works that were turning points in my approach to the creative process. One such work is Tree, Stroud Green, 2014, Which came into being because it had to: I could feel it calling me as I was walking down the street I used to live on. I got my point-and-shoot Contax T3 camera ready (which I started using for my artistic practice around that time and always carry with me) and when I turned the corner it was there. I even remember thinking “ha! It was you that was calling out to me!”. I took a couple of shots and walked on. The piece that came out is one I’m very fond of.
At that time I needed to break away from the aesthetically pleasing painterly style I’d mainly been working in up till that point. I needed something harder, something that would be both appealing and repelling. I do not like complacency in art, not as a viewer nor as a creator of art. This need to push boundaries does not come from the perspective of “aaah today I’m going to do something different, something subversive”; it comes because at some point the work calls out that this needs to happen. This image came into being because it had to. It ‘presenced’ itself and I caught it.
I recently made a film in collaboration with the composer Galya Bisengalieva, shot on my iPhone, an old SE. Once again, it was a case of something brewing, an invisible thread that I needed to follow. This came about through Galya’s invitation to create a film for a track on her album Polygon, which, after a couple of weeks of letting the music sink in, led to a first spontaneous piece shot from a double decker bus for the track Degelen. This set things up for further technical explorations on the device I was using and - finally - another ride on the same bus, the 197 between Sydenham and Peckham. It all built towards the film I landed on in the end, shot during that second bus ride, which is uncanny in its timing, composition, eeriness and perfect syncing to the music. It baffled both Galya and me afterwards, how deep the synchronicity is between the film and the music, and I can still barely believe it all came together the way it did.
Galya Bisengalieva - Degelen (Official Music Video)
I do wonder sometimes whether I’m just a vessel that captures things that get sent to me and need to be caught. It’s a funny thing to build a whole practice on chance; on sharpening the intuition to grab things rather than actively setting out to create work from scratch. It requires a leap of faith which I relish.
Your images evoke so many senses and yet you are known for creating photography, have you expressed your instinct through other media?
Oh yes, see above. I sometimes paint, mostly in watercolours. I recently did an audio-piece for an exhibition I had in Amsterdam in April 2023, and am working on another one for a future exhibition, and I’ve done three films up till now. As with everything, these things came about because they presented themselves to me in some way or other.
The three films I’ve done were shot using completely different tools: 35mm film, a Nikon D800 and my iPhone SE.
The first one, The Sea Is Always Fluid, with Aidan Gillen, was shot on 35mm. It had cinematographer Rachel Clark on camera and was one of Rachel's first films as a cinematographer back in 2011 (she now shoots feature films, among which I Am Ruth with Kate Winslet and her daughter Mia Threapleton last year). It came about because Panavision had offered Rachel a whole 35mm kit rent-free and she was looking for an opportunity to use it. I’d known Aidan for a long time (we used to see each other) and felt I’d never been able to capture him as I’d wanted to in a still. I especially wanted to capture his connection with the sea. I’d just had a good year financially so could afford the costs involved in a production like this (despite the camera kit being free, there was the insurance, transport, accommodation, processing etc to pay for still).
I had plans for what I was going to film, because when working in a setting like this, with all the cost involved and a whole team (Aidan, Rachel and the two camera assistants Tim Allen and Alejandra Fernandez) giving their time for free, you can’t go “ooh I think I’ll just see what happens and improvise on the spot!”. It was - of course - the spontaneous, everything-falling-into-place footage that we shot right at the end of the day that became the piece. The sun was setting, the sea had pulled back and formed a mirror on the shore. Aidan lay down onto that mirror, and as we were using the very the final piece of film, the flash of light you get when the celluloid is cut off, became part of the piece.
The second film I made is Blood Orange, shot on a Sunday afternoon in January 2018, in the living room of my former house. It came about through a prism of restlessness combined with boredom and an underlying emotional current, an avalanche that was heading my way which I wasn’t aware of yet at that point. It sat on my hard drive until earlier this year, post-avalanche, when the aforementioned exhibition I had in Amsterdam, with its theme of Transition/Transformation, created the perfect platform for its first outing.
The most recent film I made is Degelen in collaboration with Galya Bisengalieva, shot on my phone, which I spoke about earlier.
The audio piece I did for Amsterdam consists of readings of very brief excerpts of short stories by DH Lawrence, whose writing has had a major impact on me. This work was partly created to make visitors to the exhibition aware of the view onto the bay from the windows where this piece was installed. You can see bits of that view and hear these audio pieces on my Instagram account.
So to cap it all off, the space in which I exhibit becomes a work in itself too, with the same principles of fluke that apply to all my other works.
I realised while putting the new issue of M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN) together that I was also searching for myself within the works collected, which was an extraordinary realisation, can you share any thoughts about searching for answers within your practice?
That gives me enormous pleasure to hear. The last thing I want to do is force my thoughts and feelings onto the viewer, instead I love it when the work functions as a mirror that people can project their own thoughts and feelings onto.
I search all the time, but it isn’t answers that I’m looking for. I want to figure out what it is that I am searching for, which aspects of life I’m trying to explore and why. I don’t think there are any answers in life or art. Life is about openness and exploration - the more you open up to the world and the people around you, the more it enriches you.
With the current wave of self-obsession that came in the wake of social media and a higher level of affluence, people seem to have lost the ability to look outside of their own heads. It doesn’t do anyone any good - the more you navel-gaze the more you end up in a spiral that can lead to mental ill-health. The consumer society we live in thrives on this: the more unhappy we are the more we consume; happy people don’t tend to have this urge to consume. So the big corporations have all to gain from keeping us self-obsessed and miserable, and that counts even more for the tech giants, who need our eyeballs for their data scraping, than the classic, pre-internet corporations.
I’ve gotten to a point now where just looking at, interacting with and being in the world, brings me deep happiness and creates an urge to relay this which is irrepressible. I live in a perpetual state of wonder.
44. PRADA - A SPACE BETWEEN DESTRUCTION AND CREATION.
A series of artisan artifacts in LONDON.
Borrowed utility jackets arrive - worn down, sprouting their internal waddings - modern trophy heirlooms - a life previously lived, the marred surface of belonging. Artisanally aged to costume a chosen reality, a series of identities offer a heroine’s wardrobe of perverse contradictions and intellectual complications.
A series of unlikely pairings flirt, never to be photographed by Lindbergh's lens, alas a delicious melancholia seeps - like Absinthe on flaming cubes of sugar - to be swallowed whole - a sweet liquor rush distilled to delicacy for a grown-up palette.
Canvases shrugged on over hand-stitched flapper fringe - hang by a thread, sway on bleached oak hangers - matte-ly porous and albino against a deeply pigmented patchwork of leathers.
Meticulous micro-metal and crystal-stamped embroideries disrupt a delicacy of textiles - abrupt close-up yet protected with perfected diamond shimmer from afar.
A re-imagined replica of an archival Mario Prada bag tether an assortment of transcience, quietly signaling back to the heartbeat of a brand recognised for its DNA of the luxurious, the rare, and the symbolic.
Originally in ruched and pleated black moire, now offered in feather-light, paper-thin nappa or signature nylon - snapping-shut with an ivory lock carved in the form of a satyr head - a direct resin replica of its original mimic the possible Japanese *netsuke origin.
An artifact, more talisman than mere decorative adornment, its protruding tongue and intense grimace remind and reflect back to an ancient - future punk - to destroy is to create.
*Netsuke, formed by the characters 'ne', meaning root and 'tsuke' meaning attached - are highly prized, hand-carved micro objects originally created as toggle-like fastenings for securing the cord belts worn by gentlemen in 17th century Japan.
The Start Museum 111 Ruining Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai - until January 21, 2024.
Prada Spring Summer 2024 collection is available from January 2024.
Special thanks Rebecca Fletcher-Campbell, Edlira Panxha and Sui Zhonghua - Prada.
43. NACHO GAMMA - A SPACE BETWEEN LIGHT AND SHADOW.
The creative illuminates his personal process.
Framing the Light, was such a memorable performance piece, which came out of an extraordinary time, how do you feel now looking back at that work?
That moment helped me to give an end to a creative and personal block - by keeping myself active and not overthinking it helped me find again my path.
I, very often, return to that room through my memories. It is a way of leaving all kind of pressures behind whilst also bearing in mind the importance of following my instincts.
A sense of light feels so pertinent to your work, from those early iterations using natural light, to the portrait film with Oliver where you painted yourself in white, and then, of course, the symbolism of religious iconography which you return to, can you express why you return to light?
I have the feeling that the passage of time darkens us and that sensation used to worry me, because I had the impression that I was irremediably changing and stopping being myself. Now that I see life through a melancholic shade, I understand that, as it happens with the sunlight which transforms along the day, change is inevitable and looking at things from the darkness lets us see them brighter. That is why, for me, seeing the smallest beam of light has become such a unique event.
In fact, I find the limit between the concepts of light and shadow is something full of mystery that never stops surprising me. ¿How is it possible that two opposite elements need themselves as much to define their own existence?
I also find this duality in the relation between the human and the divine. A question which has not yet been resolved and has been reflected in our history through paintings, texts and monuments made by many other artists.
Your contribution to the first issue of the magazine was extraordinary, I remember your commitment to that project and the images captured using your Grandfather's camera. The images from the chapel and the boards of visual prayers were incredible to see, please can you introduce that work?
The photos presented in the first issue are the consequence of a transcendental moment for myself.
Fortunately, before moving for a long period to Amsterdam and later to London my grandparents passed away. I mean fortunately because my fear was to experience this situation abroad and not being able to say goodbye to them.
After that, I spent two years abroad, completely distracted about what had happened. But once I finished my Masters and I returned to Spain I decided to go back to their house.
It was a harsh blow to find my grandmother’s chair empty after I opened the door, but it was then when I noticed that I could still grasp their smell still between those walls and I began to cry. It felt like they were still there.
Both their lives were kept in boxes and among all that I found my grandfather’s old camera and some photos taken by him. I immediately knew I had to give it a new life and that moment became a farewell I had never thought I needed until that very same day.
I feel that to define you in terms of media is sort of pointless, you are just so creative, and your contribution to the projects you engage with are so full - I appreciate that there has been an internal tension regarding working as a designer and working as an artist. How do you feel now about this point of view and what have you learned from processing that tension?
As a creative, I like to work in a space between fashion and art, where creating and expressing myself is the only matter. I believe that the set of projects I have been producing create altogether a spectre that fully defines me as a person and a professional.
That is why I despise it when I have to choose between referring to myself as a fashion designer or an artist in order to be understood by others and find a place in this society. When I try to fill the box is when I understand myself the least.
In fact, I do not believe there is any tension between art and fashion, because I believe they are the same, but rather on the relationship between my way of thinking and the constant fear of not being understood, because my work is born from the need of sharing.
The performative work you create is incredibly immersive, I always found that to be very impressive – do you find that you need to protect yourself emotionally in the exposure and creation of that work, do you have an alter ego that you engage with when you perform?
I am constantly trying to get to know myself better through my work. It is even a cathartic process I undertake to move on because by expressing my feelings and experiences I avoid any trauma contaminating me.
Performance makes me feel an adrenaline that brings me so much joy and makes me live with much more intensity. While the piece is activated, I feel I have the permission to act without thinking about the consequences.
It is very visceral. It is then when I feel authentic, so this makes me question where the alter ego actually exists, inside or outside the art piece.
Your creative process seems to focus on the sensual, the tender, the body, from the works you have made so far, what do you feel you have learned in terms of your developing point of view?
I do not usually get a pause to reflect on what I have previously made because I am always thinking about what will be next, it is like a thirst that never stops. However now, when I look back, I can see a path that has come to life and I am proud of it.
What I do always bear in mind is that, in order to make something transcendental, it is necessary to stay truthful and consistent with oneself and that there is no better material than time.
42. PHILIP GUSTON - A SPACE BETWEEN THE INTIMATE AND THE ABANDONED.
Philip Guston, Tate Modern - LONDON.
From the wall of Philip Guston's easel to the infinite landscapes of his subconscious - which duly invite and reject.
Walking from room to room, the effect of retracing Guston is mesmerising - like following footsteps in snow which grow deeper as the man becomes the artist.
We see the many changes within a style, the many visual conversations and emotive sways of confidence, the trials and rewards, the tribulations and the risks which, viewed cold - seem to flush with the dreams and hopes of someone searching for himself. Reminding us all of the impossible - as the 66-year-old artist ponders at the exhibition end: 'I wish I was painting what I can now when I was 30'.
Losing elements and gaining space - how colour observed within earlier works return with personification in later paintings - renewed with a certain acceptance - As the width of the brushes increases with time, so too does the sense of freedom and immediacy, as if the time delay is narrowing to urgently communicate as the clock ticks on - speaking in a visual tone which turns from emulation to interpretation.
Ingrowing and internal, the works appear dazed yet unconfused, lighthearted yet focused - where a quivering gelatinous metropolis emerges as if from clouds of flour or icing sugar - freshly unmoulded and somehow distantly semi-translucent - as if brushing blancmange on table cloths taught over frames, using implements rummaged in kitchen draws.
A particular shade of aspic or tooth-paste-pink are semi-combined as if mixed in distraction and slathered on surfaces with a generosity of abandon - an effect which at first charms while also leaving the viewer a certain degree of nausea.
An atmosphere of cartoonish reality - where the landline rings, the neighbours argue and the sounds of the city below layer through the artist's open window - overheard in Americana colours, desperately upbeat and saturated in a platter of syrups shades which seem to dissolve to matt - thickly sweet yet tooth-achingly tempting.
Tears of the clown - distract the audience with a joke to protect from a truth which trembles with vulnerability - which the artist alone knows, and exorcises within a complex simplicity.
Guston's masterwork 'Flatlands' shocks with the heartfelt muffled thuds of a raining of objects - falling into a landscape, seemingly carpeted with snow. A spongey surface which catches each and every item with an evenness which feels unbiased even parental. Crammed into frame - a hurling of items, normally handled with care are seen in chaotic stillness - and yet, somehow viewed from the canine eye-line of the subjective - to thaw into the emotive and heartbroken - a clock's tick frozen in time - a violented moment caught-out, forever at 4:00, as the sun rises exposing a cacophony of exploded artefacts - once intimate now inanimate.
Philip Guston, Tate Modern, London - Until 25 February 2024.
Thank you: Anna Overden - Tate Modern and Neil Drabble for the recommendation.
41. CHIEDU OKONTA - A SPACE BETWEEN INTERACTION AND DISTANCE.
The artist discusses his creative process - LONDON.
The painting you made of a figure in profile is fascinating, the subject matter, the symbolism, and the sense of the unfinished which is also finished... many questions here, please can you contemplate on your feelings towards this work?
Interesting question because I remember you saw the artwork before many people did. Actually, you saw the painting during its creation. My decision to create the art was to reflect a utopian reality which did not consider a realistic representation of what I hoped the Niger Delta region of Nigeria would be, but an idealistic representation of a feeling I hoped the Niger Delta would have. A feeling of hope and peace. It is a region plagued with insecurities, pollution, violence, and corruption. Where over presented materialism is seen as saviour and use of common sense as drudgery and propositions of cowards or preys.
The idea for that painting was never resolved from the start but started as a feeling based on the subject matter and body of work I was dealing with then. I allowed it to reflect the emotions in my personal life and in that sense, open to receiving as much feedback as possible. It held space for me to consider a topic that never seemed to get resolved, which was the exploitation and unethical exploration of natural resources in the region. It helped me to explore a space I was stuck in for a long time. Both the region and I needed room to exist from the financial anchors that seemed to prevent us from truly being free. A sphere that could repurpose everything to a healthier simpler form.
The background like a lot of my paintings told the story of the artwork. This time showing a rich surreal vegetation of a previously known garden city, which included structures rebuilt with minimalistic materials and unique identities. A young character faced forward, freely riding on a beach. It projects as a surreal dream, visibly expressed by the foreground semi-photorealist character. This character was vivid and present in permanent contrast. It wore minimal clothing as if about to swim or simply sitting in a domestic environment but also to reflect the freedom from the materialistic depravity that afflicted the region. The work evolved to present a character that was not thinking but more of a reflective wandering individual. Lost from the immediate environment and instead surrounded by thoughts, like a holographic 3D screen for projecting computer generated imagery. The character was also surreal and the only affixed part of my thought process behind the painting whilst the rest was in a process of revitalising healing motion. The painting was an expression of feelings and left to stay instinctive as you can remember.
How has your journey as an artist evolved?
I find myself in conversation always referring to my works as art. I have had to substitute art for painting even here. I used to draw and paint only. I plan, resolve, and then create. Now I start with a gut feeling of what I want to say and then I start sketching loosely leaving room for continuous evolution even to the point of “completion”. The medium I choose has become the best language for expressing an idea. I paint, I sculpt, I have enjoyed printing and installations. I create. However, there are mediums I prefer over others, mostly because of proficiency and factors such as the time available to transform the idea into matter.
I do love to paint even though I feel the medium is not always as important as the message and communication. Painting and drawing will always be special to me because of the pouring of visual images that come to mind and how fast I can put them down. I even see faces on inanimate objects and surfaces, which I mentally trace the outlines in the same way I draw. Maybe just a case of pareidolia.
I feel at ease now even if the work is not what I would in the past call complete or what my level of perfection was. Not important. I am comfortable to present the information and once I am satisfied, move on. Instead of the many unfinished pieces – as I called it- I have had to let go or just give out. I am more intrigued by what other practitioners do and constantly think of ways we can work together. It’s fun to see how I can continue evolving as an artist and adapting to the stimulus that courageously stands out to me.
Photorealism is extraordinary - literally extra-ordinary and in that space there is a certain new tension, a space maybe between technique and emotion - please can you reflect on why and how you use an image to express it?
Photorealism for me did not really come by choice. It came as a need to prove to those around me who mostly were not artistically inclined at all that I could show something that required more effort and precision over a figurative painting or drawing. Also, I would not really classify my work as completely photorealistic either. I try to get away from that and go beyond it. I do not want it simply to look like the picture, so I even make it flawed, leaving parts undetailed or humorous. I want anyone looking at my work to recognise the difference. In the past, I expressed the story and the emotion behind the piece with figurative loosely created backgrounds. A representation of what already existed, exists, or even surrounds you. While the foreground is a byproduct image or images you may refer to as photorealistic. I do this to create an interaction between the piece and the audience, urging and daring you to move past the vivid realistic foreground inwards to contemplate what strings and pulls together the value in the work, which is seen in the background.
Right now, I have come to the point where I am trying to create works that provide an emotional balance between the foreground and background and where possible create an illusion based on interaction and distance. A few artists I hold in high esteem have convincingly succeeded in doing that. At least in my opinion. I don’t know if that is how they feel, themselves.
As you have mentioned, for me it required a bit more patience, and in the space of putting in time you go through many emotions. A lot of impatience, a lot of stillness, waiting to complete sections so you can move on to more interesting and challenging parts, the frustration of time spent just to realise small noticeable changes, especially for anyone observing. You sit waiting a lot.
I remember running into you at The Anselm Kiefer show at The White Cube in the summer and we were both sort of dazed by how full-on the installation felt… which artists have inspired you and what work have you connected with recently?
Yes, Anselm Keifer’s “Finnegans Wake”. Astonishing exhibition. It is definitely one of them. The vision of the exhibition and the curation was overwhelming. It had a spirit that stayed with you. My mind kept going back to it multiple times a day for weeks after. It was sad, it was strong and heavy, however it left a glimmer of hope that was not tangible to hold on to or physically present but that you could taste. Very powerful exhibition. The medium he chose to use also had a profound effect on how I now see my choice of a medium as the most appropriate voice or language to tell the story. - How he used paint as the art itself and not just a medium to express the art.
Cinga Sampson: Nzulu yemfihlakalo was definitely another one. Photorealistic oil paintings are intriguing to me as the audience to interact with it. It had what I mentioned earlier, which was an illusion based on distance. I had been contemplating the idea for a while and when I saw his, I was very impressed with how he successfully pulled it off. Sokari Douglas Camp also because of her subject matter and choice of medium and how pleased I was to see how background and heritage could offer almost identical similarities in artistic ideas.
Julie Mehretu’s exhibition at the White Cube was another one I revered. It was a technique which was very innovative. The interaction between her creations and the audience was the art. Each layer of her work presents new information. Ken Nwadiogbu’s Fragments of Reality was thermal, heated, layered in mediums, and with the suspense of the journey’s been told. I have followed his career and have seen his growth as an artist.
I am drawn to the layers. How each layer of art creates a completely different part of the piece and how it tells a unique story on its own. A layer can be removed, and the art can still be presented on its own, but it aids in adding a separate identity to the piece.
Since writing these contemplations and interviewing artists I have really felt a point that connects each person - in the sense that each artist is at one with the media that they choose to express themselves - do you feel that you have a choice to be an artist?
A visual artist, NO. I never had a choice. For me it’s been about peace of mind. Even in my late twenties when I tried to run away from it and just be an engineer, I still could not. Visual art has been an element of struggle even though I showed an incline to it from an early age. It always seemed like something I was never supposed to do as a career or even at all. Out of sheer will and stubbornness, because I enjoyed it (and still do), I kept creating. Initially through drawings, then later paintings, now paintings expanded to include other forms.
This feeling of unease or struggle to keep art in my life is reflected in most of my works as a distant surreal realm or even dream-like apparitions. It usually serves as the impetus of the piece itself. Even now I could decide to be an Engineer with my experience and skill set but my very being continuously craves to be an artist. It has been an interesting interaction with the career of an artist for me. Like the dance between two black holes in the middle of a galaxy, coming together and then pulled apart. A world that comes and evades again. In between myself and me, Chiedu and Charles. Past and present become the present’s past again. A professional career which in the times I have held it, felt uneasy, unwelcomed, uncertain, and alien. However, this is the career part, never the art creation part. That stays eternal in and with me. My pursuit to become a career artist feels like a world constantly battling to remain unresolved but content.
A piece by Chiedu Okonta is presented within the RCA X HSBC - Across & Over exhibition - available to view until 29th February 2024.
8 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 SHQ
40. DAWIT L. PETROS - A SPACE BETWEEN REFLECTIONS AND STRANGERS.
A World In Common: Contemporary African Photography, Tate Modern - LONDON.
The Stranger's Notebook explores geographical, historical, and cultural boundaries. In this series, Dawit L. Petros documents his travels from Africa to Western Europe, reflecting on a long history of migration. Passing through cities including Nouakchott in Mauritania and Catania in Sicily, Italy, the artist considers the migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers who make treacherous journeys between the two continents.
Petros photographs his companions and local people holding mirrors to the landscape, revealing reflections of coastlines, train tracks, and power lines. Conscious of his own position as an outsider in these spaces, the artist positions himself as a 'stranger', photographing his staged compositions from a distance.
Petros comments, 'For me, each of these journeys complicates Europe's status as an immutable historically and politically bounded space. I negotiated these journeys conscious that I came from elsewhere.'
Text extracted from wall didactics - 'A World In Common: Contemporary African Photography' Tate Modern 2023.
A series of works by Dawit L. Petros are presented as part of:
A World In Common: Contemporary African Photography Tate Modern, until 14 January 2024.
Special thanks to Anna Ovenden at Tate Modern.
39. GWEN JOHN - A SPACE BETWEEN WONDER AND WANDERING.
Gwen John: Art and Life in London and Paris. The Holburne Museum, BATH.
Swept up and flushed in watercolor blush - lapsing into a swathe of cream paper - to retrace a moment of gesture shared between two - the model and the artist - the artist and the artist - yet inscribed for another, the collector and benefactor.
Rodin's brilliance in capturing charged transience crackles with a thunder unheard yet felt - an electrical currency that leaps a hip-notic landscape with a caress that condemns the inquiry of line to probable fatality. With each erogenous, ergonomic line - recorded through observation - tender in tracery - nuzzle the page with graphite grazes - as the gaze of a viewer discovers Gwen John. - An exposed intimacy in suspension - whispers and devastates.
Burnt and raw, blunt paint strokes chip away the surface - an image sculpted with planes of light as if the foreground is faceted - out of focus while the viewers' gaze is lost in the background - the mid-tone tawny atmosphere of a time in the day where emptiness feels full (where adults work, children learn and the streets below are still) - where the light feels distracted - where the eye settles as if listening to the distant murmurings of a conversation in another room ...
The loaner in Gwen John - perpetual afternoon light and the tertiary shadow shades of a season in passing - lost and yet not found - where day follows day and night never falls.
The autumn's melancholic return with melodic purrs, fading in and out of consciousness in that specific way that Paris offers to those who still believe.
An impression - the listening and translated atmospheres felt with eyes open and doors closed - remembering a monochrome past - ebbing into a present still damp on the page - cautiously rendered as if moving forward in borrowed boots across powdered snow.
The instinct to express with the exhausted colours of a storm still on the horizon - a horizon of acceptance, glistening as if in a state of precipitation - leaving every surface mirrored into puddled emotions - pooling into ripples - the dérive abandonings and liberated wonderings of waiting for the rain to pass before choosing to succumb to a legacy drowned in grays.
Gwen John: Art and Life in London and Paris. The Holburne Museum BATH - until 14 April 2024.
38. NEIL DRABBLE - A SPACE BETWEEN PROXIMITY AND INTROSPECTION.
The artist reflects on his work and introduces new book ‘CLOSER', launching at The Photographers’ Gallery - LONDON.
Your new publication ‘CLOSER’ views like a bombardment of empty urban spaces - all taken within walking distance of your home in London, can you introduce this body of work and why you are presenting this now?
Well, the series didn’t come from any pre-conceived thesis or prescribed idea – I wanted to move away from that and return to starting with making. I wanted to start without an idea and see what evolved. I knew I wanted to make something ‘local’, something ‘closer’ to myself physically and psychologically, but that was the initial extent of the plan.
Also, having made a series of photographic works in the USA and Spain as well as other places, I wanted to explore the potential for making work here in the UK.
I started walking – at night – without a plan and without a destination – the walks were all circular from my home, and all at night. There was something about working at night that also appealed to me visually and psychologically. The walks continued over a year period and the pictures evolved into the work that became the new book – CLOSER. The work ended up being made during the pandemic, but it’s not intended to be a response to lockdown – the main impact the pandemic had on the work was that the streets were very deserted and silent which I think helped me in the making of the pictures.
The statement for the book text nods to what the work is about – but having said that I never think that the pictures I make are about what they are of.
Within your practice and career you have engaged extensively with portraiture - what is it about this that interests you?
I was always interested in portraiture - as I kid I used to draw and paint people. I started making photographs of people as my way into photography. For a long time, I only ever photographed people - I taught myself photography through portraits - oddly, it was a long time before I started photographing anything else - seemed natural at the time, but my very early contact sheets are all people. The thing about portraiture is that unlike other forms of photography, it is a definite collaboration- it’s a two-way activity - it’s not necessarily an equal relationship, you are definitely in charge, and you need to be able to know what you are looking for and then you work towards that with the sitter. It’s a singular vision - arrived at by two people. When I embarked on Book of Roy (MACK 2019) - what interested me was the possibility of making a very extensive series of portraits of the same person, over a long period (8 years as it turned out). I had made lots of singular portraits of famous people (writers, actors, musicians) as editorial commissions - for these you have a very limited amount of time, and are usually aiming at one definitive portrait - with the Roy work it was the total opposite, a body of work where each portrait had to be definitive in its own right, but also work as part of a larger series.
Your relationship with the US seems to really resonate within your work, what draws you back?
When I was growing up, America appeared as a very alluring and magical place – it seemed worlds apart from the dank and gloomy backdrop of 1970’s Manchester. The US TV shows presented teenage life as an endless Summer, where kids drove cars and went to High School Hops - whatever they were. In terms of photography, I think for people of my generation, this is where photography in the West evolved. As a self-taught photographer I learned from books (when I could find any), and they were predominantly American photographers usually focusing on landscape and portraiture. I guess it’s that thing of America being the mecca of some sort - the home of the image. Also, visually and semiotically it’s similar to the world I grew up in, but also different, which allows different possibilities to make work there. The signs and symbols are recognisable, but don’t come with the same social and cultural baggage for me as similar things would do in Britain. There’s also much more of it to explore. The initial shock of actually being in America eventually wears off, but there is still something that draws me back to it. I guess one of the reasons Book of Roy evolved was due to my desire to make a body of work in the USA.
Your portraits of trees are fascinating, they are a subject that you return to again and again, why is this?
I’ve always enjoyed trees for the way they make me feel.
They have the ability to elicit and suggest the potential for emotional resonance that inspires me to return to them as subject matter.
They’re also amazing kinetic sculptures, moving and changing with the seasons. They’re everywhere so it’s a subject matter that I can work with across global boundaries - they speak to people regardless of the language.
There is a historical relationship between artists also being educators, both within the work they physically make and also the work they contribute in terms of teaching others. We have discussed this at length and I remember you saying how you felt that everything in some way is part of the work, can you expand upon this?
As I said, I’m self-taught and didn’t have a great educational experience, so becoming involved in teaching was not planned - it sort of happened. A good friend kept asking me to do a guest lecture for his students, but I wasn’t sure about it - I eventually agreed, and was very surprised by how much I enjoyed the experience, how much the notion of ‘teaching’ seemed to have changed from when I was at Art School, and how much I enjoyed interacting with the students. I then made it my mission to become more involved with teaching and ended up teaching on various courses. I always saw the teaching as part of everything else - everything you do feeds into everything else - one thing that did happen was that in having to explain things to students and give lectures and tutorials, it helped me to access a dialogue with my own work and motives that had previously been on a more subliminal level. Verbalizing things to other people is a very good way to make you think about what you are trying to say.
The image of the sun drawn in the concrete, published in issue 2 of M-A (A SPACE BETWEEN), is such a pivotal work within the magazine - It says so much about the time we are in, and feels so optimistic and yet so sad at the same time, please can you tell me about this image?
The picture was made in Los Angeles for another project I’m working on. I work quite quickly and respond to things either emotionally or not. This picture seemed somehow, as you say, to straddle between being optimistic and melancholic – which I think runs through the majority of my work – in this case, the ‘up’ was ‘down’ – the sun was up, but it was down on the ground.
37. HIROSHI SUGIMOTO - A SPACE BETWEEN THE SKY AND THE HORIZON.
Hiroshi Sugimoto: Time Machine, Hayward Gallery - LONDON.
When I go to a mountain,
I feel some kind of spiritual experience,
as if a mountain's spirit enters my body,
this spiritual experience led me to wonder -
where do waterfalls go?
My answer was the sea.
H.S.
Hiroshi Sugimoto: Time Machine, The Hayward Gallery Until 7 January 2024.
Special thanks: Megan Edwards at The Hayward Gallery.
36. MARINA ABRAMOVIĆ - A SPACE BETWEEN WAITING AND RESPONSE.
Marina Abramović - The Royal Academy - LONDON. Notes from an exhibition.
Faced with focus - interconnected gazes, lines of sight, inside the eyes and out,
empathy - across a room - digitally re created - re-lived from a live recording.
- invisible like a laser, the signal - the sight detected at either end of the invisible.
'The Artist Is Present'.
The artist appears to be searching, studying the face of the viewer, one at a time - zeroing in - whose collective expression seems 'open' to those eyes.
Seen en masse from an inexhaustible camera recording every blink, looking down while the viewer looks ahead - focused and unaware of the constant documentation. the sitter is zeroing out, the camera focused in.
The artist's face - a Madonna, eyes wet exhausted glazed gaze - a line sustained from room to room, looking out looking in - as the flickering images change the atmosphere retains and remains - spaces that occupy an all-encompassing conceptual consideration.
The pencil sharpener of the father presented in the debris of life validations - of images and medals, placed, status with stationery. Stationary status. Stationary stationery.
the sense of waiting -
waiting on a white horse, with the white flag, without charge.
the fashioning of an artistic identity
the fashioning of heroism
the fashioning of martyrdom
created chaos
a sense of distance - the construction of a point
presence of body and without a body
Silhouette impressions of jars - enormous vessels - black mirrored, glazed, inverting a room in their reflection, meeting in the middle of the Great Wall of China - to conclude - a closing ceremony.
A crystal portal - mineral projections - to pass through a needle. a doorway to another space.
Mathew 19:23-24 … it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.
Faithful furniture - heeled in crystal - to touch the floor en pointe.
A church room, the threat of penance, the ladders of knives.
impossible realism.
the elongated limbs of the simple - seemingly humble, and yet architecturally conducted - churches without spires.
Minimalist yet maximal - contradictory in impression - the crystals positioned like talismans to protect - and yet - protection is exposed like the weapons of surreal function - ladders to climb to sever and to return to prevent - the function of prevention.
Searching for personal order within the created chaos of control.
The invisible collaborators of a studio, an orchestra of parts - the technician, the filmmaker - the carpenter - akin to the untraceable line of eye contact in 'The Artist Is Present'- the support of the maker allows for the work to function outside of a room set for the mass - the fashioning of such illusions.
The space left within the simplicity of presentation allows for the discomfort of sophistication which provokes a certain nothingness that is neither acknowledged nor defended. To accept like a religion - which the artist actively engages within and uses to stabilise - a Madonna whose presence is felt - even feared - we do not know the values of this world order - of processing - as the faintly heard throaty yells blur with the electrical whirrs of mechanised projections.
A retrospective of retrospection.
Marina Abramović Royal Academy Until 1 January 2024.
Special Thanks: Jessica Armbrister at The Royal Academy, London.